Menu
City Know-hows
Local planning policy is important to shape urban development decision-making. Choices about land use and development requirements can be political and require trade-offs. Understanding the influence of local politicians in the process of creating local planning policy can help to inform interventions to enable healthier place-making.
Share
Target audience
The public, urban development practitioners, national-level planning policy makers.
The problem
Built and green environments can influence population health and wellbeing. There are many stakeholders that influence decision-making for urban development and policy is very important, however, policies rarely prioritise health and wellbeing.
What we did and why
Policies can be highly influential in decision-making but little is known about how local politicians influence the process of local planning policy decision-making. In this study I show their influence, and how trade-offs can be considered that can influence health and wellbeing linked to the environment.
Our study’s contribution
This study provides new insights into the influence of political actors in local planning policy formation, including how different issues that are associated with health and wellbeing are considered, from housing affordability, housing numbers, to greenspaces and design quality.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Understanding of the influence of local political actors helps to highlight where their influence is limited, particularly by national-level housing policy, which in the UK is focused on housing numbers, rather than quality of new homes, as well as financial viability and public opinion. Understanding this can help to build trust in the political processes of decision-making and inform interventions for healthier place-making.
For further information, see the TRUUD study: a research programme about healthy urban development
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Evaluating urban environments is crucial for enhancing mental well-being. Identifying key indicators and developing a robust framework are essential steps in effectively measuring the impact. This method is fundamental for designing targeted strategies to improve mental health outcomes through informed interventions.
To work for the Right to Walk the City is to advocate for health and social justice. Public Health as a multidisciplinary action is fundamental to achieve that goal. The ‘15-minute city’ model exemplifies this approach but remains hindered by barriers such as inadequate infrastructure and social discrimination, limiting walkability for underserved communities.
This study measured the effectiveness of stepping stones as an element of landscape design – to make walking a more effective form of exercise for health. The average increase in heart rate due to steppingstones was 17.22%. In conclusion, we estimate that stepping stones can significantly increase peoples metabolic and physiological parameters, and can help the wider population to achieve the recommended government and health guidelines of ‘moderate exercise’ of 150 min/week, improving population health. This new evidence can help designers to implement ‘Active Urbanism’ strategies.
