Menu
City Know-hows
Local planning policy is important to shape urban development decision-making. Choices about land use and development requirements can be political and require trade-offs. Understanding the influence of local politicians in the process of creating local planning policy can help to inform interventions to enable healthier place-making.
Share
Target audience
The public, urban development practitioners, national-level planning policy makers.
The problem
Built and green environments can influence population health and wellbeing. There are many stakeholders that influence decision-making for urban development and policy is very important, however, policies rarely prioritise health and wellbeing.
What we did and why
Policies can be highly influential in decision-making but little is known about how local politicians influence the process of local planning policy decision-making. In this study I show their influence, and how trade-offs can be considered that can influence health and wellbeing linked to the environment.
Our study’s contribution
This study provides new insights into the influence of political actors in local planning policy formation, including how different issues that are associated with health and wellbeing are considered, from housing affordability, housing numbers, to greenspaces and design quality.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Understanding of the influence of local political actors helps to highlight where their influence is limited, particularly by national-level housing policy, which in the UK is focused on housing numbers, rather than quality of new homes, as well as financial viability and public opinion. Understanding this can help to build trust in the political processes of decision-making and inform interventions for healthier place-making.
For further information, see the TRUUD study: a research programme about healthy urban development
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Unveiling the hidden truth behind open defecation in Delhi, this study exposes the role of infrastructural incapacity and institutional failure. With 80% of surveyed households’ still practicing open defecation, the findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive policies to address the inadequacy of public and household facilities, water availability, and coordination among governmental bodies.
Our urban environments are getting hotter, yet urban design and planning solutions which can mitigate heat are rarely used. There is a need for further education and strategic planning policy positions to support heat mitigation policy and practice in the built environment.
We present a novel conceptual framework called the Urban Stress Model, which intentionally crosses disciplinary boundaries. We suggest that the unique physical form of cities contributes to an increased stress burden through the interacting influences of daily urban hazards and social disadvantage. We use New York City as a case example because of its high diabetes rates and its legacy of unequal healthcare in the context of concentrated wealth. Therefore, New York City can provide valuable insights for newly developing urban centers worldwide confronting similar challenges and growing social and health inequality.
