City Know-hows
Target audience
Professionals working on new development (e.g. architects, sustainability consultants, engineers, urban designers, etc.) planners and public health teams.
The problem
The design of built spaces affects health. Research has focused primarily on healthy planning policy development rather than implementation in the process of urban development. There is a knowledge gap about the specific problems encountered by design teams when they seek to create healthy buildings and places, including the solutions that they have adopted to overcome such challenges.
What we did and why
To explore professionals’ experiences of creating healthy development projects, we interviewed 31 built environment and public health practitioners in six countries (Australia, China, England, Netherlands, Sweden and the USA). We asked participants to tell us about a project in which they had tried to integrate health and wellbeing design measures, talking us through the background, motivation, people involved, challenges they encountered and opportunities to overcome those.
Our study’s contribution
Using the participants’ descriptions, we classified developers into two general categories about their willingness to design for health.
We found three key themes that related to integrating health into new buildings and communities. Managing risk, responsibility and economic constraints were paramount to persuade developers to adopt healthy design measures. Participants could push business-as-usual practices towards healthy urbanism by showing economic benefits or piloting new approaches. Finally, building knowledge and capacity across professionals and the public will support healthier development.
Impacts for city policy and practice
There are important lessons for urban design teams, policy-makers and practitioners.
Further information
Additional information and resources at healthyurbanism.net
Full research article:
Built environment stakeholders’ experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study by Helen Pineo and Gemma Moore.
Related posts
We investigated how Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs intersect with gentrification in Greenville’s West End by using children’s active mobility as a lens to assess community perceptions. Through observations, behavior mapping, and interviews, we explored how mobility infrastructure impacts cultural traditions and socioeconomic dynamics. This approach allowed me to uncover tensions between design intentions and community realities, providing critical insights to guide equitable, context-sensitive urban planning in rapidly changing neighborhoods.
To create healthy urban places and spaces, public acceptance is key to success.
Cities increasingly rely on assessment tools to understand whether neighbourhoods and urban systems support health and wellbeing. Yet results can depend on which tool is used. We examined fourteen widely used health assessment tools using a structured analytical framework. Our study shows that divergence is not primarily about which indicators are included, but about how tools operate across multiple layers.
