Menu
City Know-hows
Target audience
Urban farming organisations, Urban designers and planner, Landscape architect, Urban health practitioners and placemaking NGOs.
The problem
Singapore faces the challenge to adapt to a new urban lifestyle after the declaration in 2021 of the ‘Green Plan’ agenda on sustainable development. The plan includes strategies to increase access to urban greenery and biodiversity in the city. Nevertheless, there have been reported cases of low citizen tolerance towards the newly introduced biodiversity. Additionally, unsustainable behaviours of citizens could be a threat to the new natural ecosystems.
What we did and why
Our research investigated a pro-environmental organisation in Singapore that has implemented participatory programs with nature and aims to improve the health and wellbeing of people and their connection to nature for over a decade. We conducted focus groups, discussions and surveys to establish the benefits of engaging in these programs and to understand to what extent the facilitators of the process have an impact in the way people shape their connection with nature, developing pro-environmental behaviours.
Our study’s contribution
Our work supports a new approach to placemaking with nature and the therapeutic value of non-curated natural landscapes. It shows the:
Improvement of health and wellbeing in heavily urbanised cities through the implementation of programs that enhance the connection with the natural environment,
Importance of the facilitators of placemaking in the long term to create an improved psychological wellbeing and sense of community.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Urban Policies should consider integrating nature placemaking strategies to enhance the health and wellbeing of citizens and their conviviality. Experienced nature placemaking facilitators and their spaces could become a learning hub for young citizens that have not yet experienced a raw natural environment in Singapore. Importantly, this could increase pro-environmental behaviours and tolerance towards natural biodiversity.
Further information
See the Urban Land Institute/Health Leaders Network at NeuroLandscape: NeuroLandscape is a non-profit research group/ NGO that brings together landscape architecture, neuroscience and computer science to advance the knowledge on the relationship between human health and the environment in urban areas. Their aim is to uncover the complex mechanisms of these phenomena and share them with an international audience of academics, designers, decision makers and urban communities.
Full research article:
Participatory approaches to enact meaningful interconnectedness with the natural environment: a case study in Singapore by Diana M. Benjumea, Yohei Kato and Keng Hua Chong.
Related posts
Violence and abuse by and among youth are critical public health issues. Building equitable cities requires centring the voices of marginalised young people, whose experiences provide vital insights into safer urban spaces. Supporting marginalised youth in shaping safer cities is a delicate balance, like the porcupine’s dilemma; —nurturing participation while ensuring protection. Together, we can create safer, more equitable spaces for all.
How can we systematically embed health in real estate decision-making to improve health outcomes related to our urban environment? We mapped the system of health consideration in urban development decision-making to identify leverage points and inform interventions that can generate virtuous feedback loops to support better urban health.
Belfast has very high levels of car use. Working with stakeholders we tried to understand what factors influence this. System wide factors, such as financial models for transport, a collective car-orientated mindset and car dominated road infrastructure, have the strongest influence on individual behaviour.
