Menu
City Know-hows
Can Safe Routes to School inadvertently fuel gentrification? This article explores how mobility infrastructure in Greenville’s West End reshapes communities, revealing the risks of cultural displacement and offering actionable strategies for urban practitioners to design equitable, context-sensitive interventions.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, municipal policymakers, and Safe Routes to School coordinators.
The problem
We address the unintended consequences of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs in gentrifying neighborhoods, where mobility infrastructure often clashes with local cultural values and socioeconomic dynamics. In Greenville’s West End, such interventions risk displacing community traditions and accelerating demographic shifts. By overlooking the lived experiences of vulnerable residents, planners may inadvertently deepen inequities. Our work highlights the need for equity-focused design that aligns active mobility goals with the preservation of cultural and social cohesion.
What we did and why
We investigated how Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs intersect with gentrification in Greenville’s West End by using children’s active mobility as a lens to assess community perceptions. Through observations, behavior mapping, and interviews, we explored how mobility infrastructure impacts cultural traditions and socioeconomic dynamics. This approach allowed me to uncover tensions between design intentions and community realities, providing critical insights to guide equitable, context-sensitive urban planning in rapidly changing neighborhoods.
Our study’s contribution
This study challenges planners and designers to reconsider how mobility infrastructure can unintentionally exacerbate inequities in gentrifying neighborhoods. Our findings contribute to more equitable and context-sensitive urban practices by:
• Highlighting how mobility infrastructure risks cultural displacement and community fragmentation.
• Demonstrating the importance of aligning design goals with local cultural and social dynamics.
• Providing actionable insights for integrating community engagement into the planning of active mobility initiatives.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This study underscores the need for city policies and practices to prioritize equity and cultural preservation in mobility planning. Key implications include:
• Incorporating robust community engagement to ensure mobility infrastructure aligns with local values and needs.
• Evaluating the potential for displacement or cultural disruption when implementing active mobility initiatives.
• Designing flexible, equity-focused frameworks that balance accessibility and cultural preservation, ensuring vulnerable populations benefit from development without experiencing displacement or marginalization.
Further information
Full research article:
Unintended gentrification: community perspectives on children’s active mobility in the American South by Lyndsey Deaton & Zahra Ghazanfari
Related posts
The by-products of urbanisation, such as air pollution and neighbourhood disadvantage, are often overlooked when studying the impact of urban environments on depression. Understanding how these influence neighbourhood-depression relationships can help inform targeted public health interventions and reduce health disparities.
Urban greenness affects people’s physical and mental health. Residential greenness is associated with reductions in cortisol levels after six months in patients with chronic heart failure undergoing rehabilitation.
Living in modern cities can increase cardiovascular disease risk. This study analyzes the association between urban design and obesity, proposing a simplified index to assess how the built environment impacts heart health. Our “Urban-Obesity-Index” helps local authorities and planners design healthier neighbourhoods.
