City Know-hows

Institutional inertia in a model capital: Environmental health indicators and fragmented urban governance in Islamabad

The iconic Faisal Mosque and Islamabad view, backed by Margalla Hills National Park. Image by Adnan Khalid from Pixabay.

Unregulated urbanization in Islamabad fuels flooding and health risks like dengue, revealing gaps in environmental health integration. Our study’s insights urge planners to prioritize equitable, health-focused urban policies.

Share

Target audience

City officers and urban leaders in Pakistan and international organizations like WHO and UN-Habitat, who can drive knowledge transfer on health-integrated urban planning to address environmental risks in LMICs like Pakistan.

The problem

Rapid urbanization in Islamabad exacerbates environmental health risks, poor air quality, water contamination, declining green cover, inadequate waste management, and urban heat stress, particularly affecting informal settlements. Fragmented governance, institutional silos, symbolic policy integration, and low budgetary priority (5–15% for environmental health) prevent meaningful institutionalization of Environmental Health Indicators, leading to health inequities and unsustainable development in this once-model planned capital.

What we did and why

We conducted a qualitative study approach to explore Environmental Health Indicator integration in Islamabad’s urban planning. Through Key Informant Interviews and In-Depth Interviews, we examined air quality, water, green cover, and waste management policies. we aimed to uncover barriers like governance silos and symbolic policies to inform equitable urban health strategies, addressing the urgent need for health-focused planning in rapidly urbanizing cities like Islamabad to mitigate risks.

Our study’s contribution

Our study offers fresh insights into why Environmental Health Indicators remain poorly institutionalized in a planned capital like Islamabad, advancing understanding of governance failures in LMICs. It identifies fragmented governance as the core mechanism, with barriers like institutional silos, political interference, expert exclusion, and underfunding. Using the IAD framework, it provides a diagnostic tool for similar cities and highlights opportunities for reform amid ongoing Master Plan delays.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Our recommendations include establishing a dedicated Urban Environmental Health Authority for cross-agency coordination, embedding binding Environmental Health Indicator targets (e.g., air quality thresholds, green space ratios) in the revised Master Plan, ring-fencing budgets for environmental health (at least 10–15%), and creating real-time data platforms with public participation. These steps can help city leaders in Pakistan and beyond shift from reactive to proactive, equitable planning, reducing health risks in vulnerable communities.

Further information

Full research article:

Related posts

How much research is there on environmental exposures and cognition?

It is known that environmental exposures can have negative effects on brain health. We reviewed all the literature examining the effects of environmental exposures on cognitive health. There is a paucity of research on the effects of urban planning, particularly regarding things like active travel and green space accessibility.

Read More »

A psychology and power intervention to help decision-makers prioritise health in ­­­urban development

Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.

Read More »

Challenges and paradigms to evaluate the relationship of urban environments with population health

Our study introduces and reviews how the built environment and its relation to population health are assessed in the literature. We did this by identifying methodological shortcomings and research potentials that need to be addressed jointly. Our assessment aims to undertake multiple health issues in an integrated manner, and identify priorities within the city whereby health is a primary goal.

Read More »