Menu
City Know-hows
Who supports proposals to manage if, when and where new takeaways can open near schools? According to our recent study,over 50% of adults living in Great Britain!
Share
Target audience
Planning professionals working in practice, Local government elected politicians, National policy makers
The problem
Global trends indicate that takeaway food is commonly accessible in neighbourhood food environments. Local governments in England can use spatial planning to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in “takeaway management zones around schools” (known elsewhere as “exclusion zones”).
What we did and why
The adoption of takeaway management zones near schools has been advocated for internationally, and some local authorities in England have done so. However, there remains scope for further adoption. Public support for population health interventions, and the extent to which these are viewed as effective at achieving their stated aims can influence political will for adoption. We analysed data from the International Food Policy Study to investigate public acceptability of takeaway management zones around schools.
Our study’s contribution
Our findings focus on what adults living in Great Britain think about takeaway management zones around schools.
• More than half supported proposals, and less than one in ten were against them.
• Most reported that these zones would help people to eat better.
• They typically agreed that fewer takeaways near schools would allow healthier food outlets to open, schools to promote healthy food and mean that young people ate takeaway food less often.
Impacts for city policy and practice
High levels of public acceptability for takeaway management zones around schools, especially in terms of support for adoption can reassure policy makers that proposals would not receive substantial public disapproval. Policy makers should not, therefore, use limited public support to rationalise policy inertia.
Planning professionals can use our findings to support their future proposals.
Further information
Full research article:
Public acceptability of proposals to manage new takeaway food outlets near schools: cross-sectional analysis of the 2021 international food policy study by Matthew Keeble, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Michael Chang, Steven Cummins, Daniel Derbyshire, David Hammond, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Christine M. White, Martin White & Thomas Burgoine.
Related posts
The quality of life for autistic individuals is closely linked not only to societal attitudes and the level of support provided by local and national authorities but also to the spatial and formal aspects of their surrounding environment. A key question is: How can urban planners, architects, and decision-makers facilitate the creation of autism-friendly cities?
Gentrification exacerbates financial insecurity for economically vulnerable residents, leading to increased stress.
Public health has historically been an important factor driving urban planning policy in England but is currently rarely a priority. We explore the factors behind this, try to explain them in the context of policy developments since COVID-19, and consider what needs to change at national policy level to support healthier placemaking in the future.
