Menu
City Know-hows
The quality of life for autistic individuals is closely linked not only to societal attitudes and the level of support provided by local and national authorities but also to the spatial and formal aspects of their surrounding environment. A key question is: How can urban planners, architects, and decision-makers facilitate the creation of autism-friendly cities?
Share
Target audience
All teams working with improving the mental and brain health of children and adolescents, especially the WHO team. Also the WHO team that works with ICF International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and such teams at UN-Habitat.
The problem
The quality of life for autistic individuals depends not only on social and cultural factors but also on environmental ones.
Currently, our knowledge of the spatial characteristics of the built environment—specifically, the barriers and facilitators related to the participation of autistic individuals in social life—is limited.
What we did and why
Through an interdisciplinary review of existing academic literature on the relationship between autism and urban planning, I aimed to provide a theoretical framework for addressing autism from the perspective of urban planning. I reference the emerging paradigm of neurodiversity and seek to connect it with urban theories of justice. My goal is to highlight the importance of the built environment in realizing the autistic community’s right to the city and their participation in decision-making processes.
Our study’s contribution
Looking at autism through the lens of urban planning theory, I argue that:
• There is a gap in how neurodiversity addresses spatial justice and the rights of the autistic community about the built environment.
• Urban planning theory can provide a useful framework for neurodiversity, supporting the rights of neurodivergent individuals within the city.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This study should be seen as an introduction to a new research domain: autism and the built environment. With support from future empirical research, it has the potential to:
• Introduce new design and planning guidelines for addressing the spatial needs of autistic individuals in planning processes.
• Incorporate participatory methods to involve the autistic community in decision-making processes.
• Inform existing building and planning regulations to better address the needs of autistic individuals.
Further information
Full research article:
Autism in urban planning: in search of a theoretical framework by Mohammad Sarraf
Related posts
The global COVID-19 pandemic, with its associated issues of isolation, enhanced hygiene practices and contact tracing brought up a number of issues to the public domain, many of which bordered on the nexus between urban planning and public health. We examine how new ideas concerning the linkages between urban planning and public health revealed by the COVID-19 crisis can be integrated into practice and how we might leverage this knowledge to build more just, healthier and liveable cities.
We must take a careful look into the structures, policies, and programs that may be barriers to inclusion of children with disabilities in the community. Assess to intervene and create cities that are inclusive of and healthy for all!
Odour pollution impacts our mental and physical wellbeing without being noticed very often – bad smells can have a negative impact on how we think and feel. Bad odour can affect our work and home environments in a negative way so why don’t we take it more seriously?
