Target audience

Urban planners and architects, policy-makers and local government, public health practitioners, and the public!

The problem

The presence of water features in urban environments are important for human health and wellbeing and arguably have a greater role in densely built-up environments. The lack of maintenance of fountains and public squares may cause feelings of stress and anxiety to citizens. There is currently little research that explores the connection between conservation and maintenance of water features in urban places and the relationship with people’s health and wellbeing.

What we did and why

This study draws on qualitative in-depth interviews with regards to a restoration project of a water feature which is located at the entrance of the city in Valetta, the capital city of Malta. The research explores the role of the Triton fountain and square before and after its restoration and conservation to understand its potential influence as a therapeutic blue urban space.

Our study’s contribution

Citizens find nature-like architecture of urban water features supportive for their wellbeing through:

  • Interaction that enables a connection to nature and place,

  • Managing potential stress and anxiety by providing a place to cope with an urban heat island environment, chaos, danger, noise, and pollution,

  • Aesthetic attributes and recalling memories of place before restoration which can help provide a therapeutic environment.

Impacts for city policy and practice

The findings highlight the potential of urban water features to provide a therapeutic environment for citizens. Planners and urban developers could consider the investment in restoration of architectural design of urban water features as an intervention to support citizens health and wellbeing as part of planned therapeutic blue urban spaces.

Further information

Not available.

Full research article:

Related posts

Opportunities and challenges of using mobile phone data for evaluating placed-based interventions: A green space pilot

There is limited evaluation of whether green space interventions lead to more people using these spaces. This is partly due to the difficulty of collecting data on visits to green spaces. Mobile phone data may offer one solution, but are rarely made available to researchers. As such, there is less examination of whether these data are valuable. We accessed small area anonymised mobile phone GPS data for Liverpool (2021-2022). Using a case study of wildflower planting, we identified green spaces where wildflowers were planted. A synthetic control was then constructed to identify similar green spaces where planting did not take place. We then compared the number of visits post-intervention between the intervention and control green sites. Our paper also gives an empirical and methodological evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using mobile phone data, which can inform others on how to best use them.

Read More »