City Know-hows

How do we make sustainable and healthy diets acceptable, appealing, and appropriate in local settings?

Danish fish market. Photo by Nick Karvounis on Unsplash

Target audience

Those in charge of Copenhagen’s food strategy and food strategies in other cities worldwide. International and national food NGOs. Public health food practitioners.

The problem

Poor diets are both the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, while also being a key driver of climate change. While efforts have been made to design a global diet that is good for both people and planet (the Eat-Lancet reference diet), this diet does not take into account different eating norms in different places nor how they might affect uptake.

What we did and why

To understand how people in one Copenhagen neighbourhood navigated their food environments and explore the implications for bringing diets in line with the Eat-Lancet reference diet, we designed a photo-elicitation study. Over three weeks, participants took photos of their food environments and the facilitators and barriers to healthy eating. They attended workshops where they discussed these photos and reflected on how a healthy and sustainable diet might be facilitated.

Our study’s contribution

  • Insights into the different factors that shape people’s food purchasing and consumption and how they interact with each other.
  • Insights into how the food environment might need to be adapted so that foods that fit in with a healthy and sustainable diet are affordable, appealing, and accessible.
  • Insights that are grounded in the lived experiences and critical reflections of people living and eating in one neighbourhood of Copenhagen.

Impacts for city policy and practice

Adapting the Eat-Lancet reference diet to local circumstances  requires a deep understanding of how and where people acquire food, and what other roles food plays in people’s lives. To reshape diets, what is available in the food environment must match what fits in with pre-existing practices and values.

Policy makers must understand the non-monetary benefits that food environments bring to people, such as providing time for other activities or promoting broader wellbeing through social engagement.

Further information

Full research article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Designing and implementing nature-based intervention, for the health of our community

Do we have the potential to combat childhood obesity rates with nature based programs? How does the design of community-based programming play a role?
Our study, analyzing 4,010 articles, reveals nature-based interventions promote healthy living. Focusing on community engagement and program gaps, our research highlights innovative strategies for healthier children. A collaborative approach offers new hope in addressing this global health challenge.

Read More »

Walkable Campuses: Tactical urbanism and complete streets in Brazilian knowledge territories

Exploring complete streets implementation in knowledge production territories, this research examines the potentials and limitations of using campuses as living labs, applying tactical urbanism. It identifies the opportunities for enhancing walkability and inclusivity and the challenges, e.g. regulatory issues and limited funding, stressing the role of governance and community engagement.

Read More »