Menu
City Know-hows
With so many different forms of guidance available for incorporating health into planning, our study evaluated what makes a healthy planning framework successful.
Share
Target audience
Healthy urban planners, Public Health, urban planners.
The problem
While there are a wide number of frameworks and tools to support the integration of health into urban planning available, they have not yet been systematically evaluated.
What we did and why
We conducted a systematic appraisal, made up of desk research and semi-structured interviews, of seven healthy planning frameworks designed for use in the UK. We used this to identify information on the challenges and best practices for healthy planning framework design and implementation.
Our study’s contribution
Shared challenges, best practices, and considerations for success were identified around the following themes: framework design & conceptualisation, framework recommendations & content, implementation outcomes & impact, framework evaluations, and other more general challenges.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our results include several key considerations for practitioners in health and planning to include when designing healthy planning guidance, frameworks, or tools. The results are also useful for practical implementation of tools, and we include recommendations on outcome evaluation of applying healthy planning frameworks.
Further information
This UN-Habitat/WHO Sourcebook provides a useful mapping of existing health planning frameworks:Â WHO webpage.
Full research article:
A thematic analysis of UK healthy planning frameworks and tools designed to support the inclusion of health in urban planning by Amber De La Haye, Ruth Gow, Amelia Lake, Caitlin Ball, Sebastiaan van Herk, Marta Rofin Serra, Andy Jones, Michael Chang and Helen Moore.
Related posts
This research extends existing scholarship by contextualizing Healthy City principles within Saudi Arabia’s specific climatic conditions, demographic transitions, and centralized governance structures. Rather than advocating direct replication of international models, the study emphasizes learning from international experiences to inform context-specific strategies aligned with Vision 2030 and national sustainability priorities. By interpreting international experiences within Saudi urban realities, this work provides a geographically specialized and policy-relevant contribution to the discourse on sustainable and healthy urban development.
The quality of life for autistic individuals is closely linked not only to societal attitudes and the level of support provided by local and national authorities but also to the spatial and formal aspects of their surrounding environment. A key question is: How can urban planners, architects, and decision-makers facilitate the creation of autism-friendly cities?
As emerging challenges have made urban areas increasingly vulnerable, jeopardizing the health and well-being of their inhabitants, resilience should be seen as a pathway for healthy cities and integrated into urban planning practices. This study shows if and how existing indicator frameworks can identify urban systemic vulnerabilities and priorities for resilience building to provide local authorities with evidence crucial in planning for healthy and resilient cities.
