Menu
City Know-hows
Urban environments are a major contributor to non-communicable diseases and health inequalities, including those linked to planetary health. This transdisciplinary research team is working with influential property developers to help change their intention to act on health.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners and developers, Landowners/promoters, Investors, Politicians and civil servants, Citizens
The problem
Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation.
What we did and why
We developed an intervention called “Changing Mindsets”, which is aimed at private sector decision-makers working in urban planning and development. The programme is designed to address some of the challenges to achieving change within this sector, such as, perceived lack of power to affect change and inertia in the development system, with the aim of increasing participants’ intention to act on health within their work.
Our study’s contribution
This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This research aims to increase awareness of, and intention to act on, health within the urban planning industry. This could result in lower incidences of noncommunicable disease linked to the built environment (although due to the complexity of impact pathways over time, this is difficult to demonstrate). There will also be benefits to early adopters of this form of health promotion within urban development, who should be seen as pioneers within their field.
TRUUD project site: https://truud.ac.uk/ for more information on the TRUUD project and the other intervention areas
Further information
Full research article:
Development and evaluation of an intervention designed to increase the prioritisation of health by professionals working in the private sector of urban development: study protocol by Rebecca J. Linnett, Krista Bondy, Martha Jordan, Daniel Black and Sophie L. Turnbull.
Related posts
Cities need to be aware of their vulnerabilities to local emergencies. They also need to understand which urban planning, design and management strategies work best to build resilience. We reviewed the latest scientific evidence to identify the most effective preparedness strategies for different emergency scenarios, analysing co- and dis-benefits among them. Ideas and tools for local authorities and communities in general to build back better.
Envisioning a socially and ecologically sustainable human habitat: Connecting Land.
Even within relatively wealthy cities, food insecurity and health inequalities can be sharply concentrated in specific neighborhoods. We show how economic inequality, food access, and health outcomes are closely linked across Staten Island — and what this means for city leaders and practitioners.
