Menu
City Know-hows
Public parks shape how people meet, stay, and interact. This study shows how specific physical features of an urban park influence everyday social life, offering practical lessons for designing public spaces that support social interaction, wellbeing, and inclusive urban vitality.
Share
Target audience
Municipal park managers and public space officers; Urban designers and landscape architects working in dense cities; City policy-makers concerned with urban health and social wellbeing
The problem
Many urban parks are well designed visually but fail to support everyday social interaction. Decisions are often driven by aesthetics, maintenance, or safety concerns, rather than how people actually use space. This problem is common in cities worldwide, leading to underused parks and missed opportunities for social connection, mental wellbeing, and community cohesion. Without understanding how physical features shape social life, cities struggle to create public spaces that truly support daily urban life.
What we did and why
We studied Honarmandan Park in Tehran to understand how physical design influences social life in a real urban setting. We combined on-site observation of people’s behaviour with surveys of park users and spatial analysis. We did this to move beyond abstract design principles and provide evidence-based insights into how seating, pathways, land use, inclusiveness, and safety shape everyday social interactions in public spaces.
Our study’s contribution
This study adds clear, practice-oriented evidence on how social life emerges in public spaces. We show that:
• Inclusive design and accessible layouts strongly increase social interaction
• Seating and urban furniture play a central role in encouraging people to stay and interact
• Mixed land uses near parks extend social activity and length of stay
These findings translate research into concrete design priorities.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This research shows that improving social life in parks does not always require major redevelopment. We recommend:
• Prioritising inclusive seating and human-scale design
• Integrating parks with nearby cultural, recreational, and commercial uses
• Designing for perceived safety through visibility and active edges
These actions can help cities create healthier, more socially vibrant public spaces.
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
We explored the combined effects of housing affordability, quality, tenure, and neighbourhood conditions on mental health outcomes. We gathered data through a survey involving 470 questionnaires for analysis. We have been able to isolate what matters in relation to housing and mental health in our Iranian cohort.
Do we have the potential to combat childhood obesity rates with nature based programs? How does the design of community-based programming play a role?
Our study, analyzing 4,010 articles, reveals nature-based interventions promote healthy living. Focusing on community engagement and program gaps, our research highlights innovative strategies for healthier children. A collaborative approach offers new hope in addressing this global health challenge.
How can we systematically embed health in real estate decision-making to improve health outcomes related to our urban environment? We mapped the system of health consideration in urban development decision-making to identify leverage points and inform interventions that can generate virtuous feedback loops to support better urban health.
