Menu
City Know-hows
Are there any knowledge gaps that require further research to enhance the development of context-specific policies towards effective pandemic planning and response? How can we build resilience and sustainable livelihoods in informal settlements during public health emergencies?
Share
Target audience
Public health professionals, urban health researchers and policymakers working in low-resource settings.
The problem
In informal settlements, the impact of COVID-19 can be alarmingly severe due to the lack/limited access to infrastructure, densely populated living conditions, and pre-existing socio-economic inequalities. There are limited studies that synthesise evidence from the literature on the COVID-19 lived experiences of informal settlement dwellers, often overlooked in scientific studies and policy-making initiatives. This can limit our comprehensive understanding of the realities of these communities and affect our concerted efforts of effective pandemic planning and response.
What we did and why
We systematically reviewed empirical evidence on COVID-19 from the literature. We focusing on informal settlements in the Global South. We then captured and analysed key themes on COVID-19 health-related behaviours (knowledge, attitude, and practice), lockdown impacts, and social protection programs provided to help vulnerable dwellers survive amid the pandemic. The rationale is to identify knowledge gaps and highlight future research and practice implications.
Our study’s contribution
To deepen our understanding of COVID-19 behaviours in informal settlements, we need to investigate factors moderating and mediating the complex COVID-19 risk perception-behaviour nexus by applying pandemic-based behavioural change models. Also, an in-depth exploration of why social protections to address the socio-economic, physical, and health-related impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown did not reach beneficiaries will be critical since the very limited literature has provided contradictory evidence.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Addressing the knowledge gaps in COVID-19 literature in informal settlements remains crucial in the broader discussions on infection and pandemic control, health equity and social justice. This can help city authorities, public health officials, and governments to develop and implement cost-effective behaviour change interventions and socially acceptable policies for pandemic response in informal settlements to support health and well-being.
Further information
Full research article:
[OPEN ACCESS] COVID-19 lived experiences among informal settlement dwellers in the global south: a scoping review by Richmond Amponsah, Marie Vaganay Miller, Nigel McConnell and Aaron Lawson.
Related posts
Livability is a people-oriented concept, and accurately measuring it requires a contextual understanding of what local stakeholders deem essential for making communities livable. Despite extensive research on livability indicators, most studies have taken a top-down approach, with few considering the input of the communities.
Compactness level urban areas have different health related outcomes during COVID-19.
Understanding decision-making for active living infrastructure in a middle-income country: Aspirations and pressures for development may not support creation of good quality walking and cycling
