Menu
City Know-hows
Building place attachment and sense of community through design can improve community well-being, yet reviews on this topic are lacking. This manuscript presents a systematic review of the links between pedestrian designs and place attachment and sense of community, and also highlights several health equity considerations to encourage new ideas about inclusive and healthy urban design practice and study.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, public health practitioners, landscape architects
The problem
Despite the many health and quality of life benefits that are often linked with pedestrian urban designs, reviews of the social health implications of these designs are sparse. Currently, no reviews have documented and assessed the literature exploring the relationship between pedestrian urban designs and place attachment and sense of community, or the extent to which equity considerations (e.g., reports on age, sex/gender, ethnic background, social class etc.) have been assessed.
What we did and why
We wanted to explore the extent to which pedestrian urban designs are linked with positive or negative reports of place attachment and sense of community, as well as explore equity considerations within this literature. Being able to review this literature can inform researchers about the state of the evidence and areas for future study, encourage interdisciplinary collaborations, as well as suggest best practices for urban planners and public health practitioners.
Our study’s contribution
Our review highlights that the overall quality of evidence regarding studies of the relationship between pedestrian urban design and place attachment and sense of community is quite weak; there is a need for more rigorous study on this topic.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Findings from the review have implications for environmental design interventions, policies, and initiatives to promote community health, including:
• Social and site maintenance (e.g. building garden beds), programming associated with gathering spaces (e.g. community gardens), can support positive attachments and relations among older individuals.
• Combining socially-oriented interventions like social prescriptions with currently underused or planned pedestrian spaces could be a potential strategy to support communal social well-being through building attachments and connections.
Further information
Full research article:
Place attachment and sense of community in natural and built pedestrian spaces: an equity-informed systematic review by Adrian Buttazzoni & Bridget Irwin.
Related posts
City makers need to stop making cities for ‘normal’ circumstances. Cities are liveable only when they can respond and reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change.City makers, policy makers
Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.
Compactness level urban areas have different health related outcomes during COVID-19.
