Menu
City Know-hows
Thailand has spent 16 years developing design guidelines for the elderly and people with disabilities. Still, accessible design for cognition remains inadequate for the impending super-aged society. This mismatch emphasises a critical failure in design planning that demands urgent improvement.
Share
Target audience
Policy makers, urban planners, and designers
The problem
Ministerial design regulations play a crucial role in guiding architects and designers in creating accessible environments, particularly for social spaces. However, accessible design has traditionally focused on physical aspects, often overlooking cognitive needs, resulting in designs that do not fully support users. With the global population rapidly ageing and cognitive decline on the rise, this challenge is especially pressing in developing countries like Thailand, which is now an ageing society with limited preparedness to adapt.
What we did and why
I analysed Thailand’s ministerial design regulations, focusing on their accessibility across eight cognitive domains and their practicality in design for individuals with cognitive challenges to evaluate their effectiveness. Using a conformance rating system, I assessed accessibility levels and converted the results into statistical data. I then compared cognitive performance between lower and upper pathways, as well as between individuals with and without cognitive problems, to identify differences, limitations, and shortcomings in the regulations’ current applications.
Our study’s contribution
In this study, I highlight the limitations of accessible design regulations in addressing cognitive aspects, particularly the inadequate consideration of higher-order cognitive functions. I also underscore the challenges in applying these regulations to real-world designs, especially for older adults and individuals with disabilities who face cognitive difficulties. These findings reveal ongoing design barriers that hinder access to public spaces and expose specific, often overlooked design flaws that I believe require immediate and appropriate solutions.
Impacts for city policy and practice
To build a sustainable, healthy city, I believe the issue of public design being inaccessible due to a range of cognitive limitations must be addressed with concrete solutions. This begins with national standards that clearly integrate cognitive functions into design regulations, providing a solid foundation for regulating built environments. Additionally, I emphasize that designers must develop a deep understanding of cognitive performance and the specific needs of users with cognitive limitations when creating their designs.
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Extreme heat and wildfire smoke are a growing concern in cities. Cooling and cleaner air centres can provide a much-needed respite but too often they’re set up reactively and inconsistently. Our study explores what works, what doesn’t, and how cities can design these spaces to be reliable, inclusive, and accessible for all.
Interventions on riverfronts require close consideration of contextual ecological and social aspects. We adopted a research-by-design process to discuss nature-inspired urban design strategies in an Irish context.
• We conducted a desk study of academic literature and urban policies to establish the suitability of various methods for the site characteristics;
• We performed site analyses (site observations, footfall counting, photographic documentation) for an in-depth understanding of the existing conditions. We developed urban design scenarios to envision potential approaches, on which public feedback was sought.
Cities can build stronger, healthier, and more resilient communities by tailoring resilience strategies to the unique vulnerabilities and strengths of each neighbourhood. This approach ensures resilience is integrated into both emergency response and the long-term development of urban areas.
