Menu
City Know-hows
How can we systematically embed health in real estate decision-making to improve health outcomes related to our urban environment? We mapped the system of health consideration in urban development decision-making to identify leverage points and inform interventions that can generate virtuous feedback loops to support better urban health.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners and policymakers, real estate investors and developers, population health policymakers focusing on urban health.
The problem
Evidence shows the links between the quality of our urban environment and health outcomes, such as the effects of housing conditions, air quality, and access to nature on non-communicable diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, cancer, and mental health. We need to understand this complex problem by applying a systems approach that considers the interconnected factors and private and public sector decision-makers that shape real estate development in order to design effective responses.
What we did and why
We investigated how health is considered in urban development decision-making from a real estate perspective by creating a system map based on interviews with 21 senior real estate professionals. Through this, we identified the interconnected factors, feedback loops, and decision-makers that influence the extent to which health is considered to inform intervention strategies for public and private urban development stakeholders to build healthier urban environments.
Our study’s contribution
Our study presents a system map and the key feedback loops driving the consideration of health in urban development decision-making from the perspective of real estate professionals. To support our understanding of the model and inform system-led interventions, we add further layers of information including the characterisation of system factors in structural, attitudinal, and transactional dimensions – indicating their potential leverage and speed of change – and identifying the actors involved in the decision-making processes.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our systems map demonstrates that developing a standardised data-led approach to measuring health outcomes across real estate can leverage improved health standards by increasing users/tenants/clients’ demand for health, shareholders/bondholders’ demand for ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and health, and planners/regulators’ ability to include health in urban development decision-making. We suggest this data-led health metric be developed in collaboration between the real estate industry, planners and policymakers, civil society, and academia through a purposeful institutional structure such as a forum.
TRUUD (Tackling the Root causes Upstream of Unhealthy Urban Development): This provides more information about the wider research on health and urban development decision-making, including a relevant blog post on the relationship between urban planning and public health: https://truud.ac.uk/unravelling-the-relationship-between-urban-planning-and-health/
Further information
Full research article:
 A systems approach to improving health consideration in UK urban development: a real estate perspective by Pablo Newberry, Heeseo Rain Kwon and Neil Carhart.
Related posts
Health impact assessments are a key tool to bridge the worlds of planning and health, but there’s a risk they become a ‘tick box’ exercise with little real-world benefit. Learning from recent practice in English local authorities can help maximise their effectiveness in producing healthier developments.
The global COVID-19 pandemic, with its associated issues of isolation, enhanced hygiene practices and contact tracing brought up a number of issues to the public domain, many of which bordered on the nexus between urban planning and public health. We examine how new ideas concerning the linkages between urban planning and public health revealed by the COVID-19 crisis can be integrated into practice and how we might leverage this knowledge to build more just, healthier and liveable cities.
Wayfinding interventions offer a viable, low-cost, intervention to increase recreational walking in urban greenspaces for irregular users, older adults and those with mobility impairments.
