Menu
City Know-hows
Public open spaces (e.g., parks, sports fields) are important for people to be physically active. However, previous studies, mostly conducted in Western countries, show that people are predominantly sedentary in such spaces. We found that public open space users were more active in Asia, suggesting a potential contribution of such spaces to people’s health.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, park managers, health advocates
The problem
We know from existing studies that people spend most of time sitting in public open spaces in Western countries. However, there are just a few studies on public open space use carried out in Asian countries.
What we did and why
We conducted an on-site intercept survey in 10 public open spaces in Bangladesh and the Philippines. We collected data from 804 adult participants who reported the duration of active use (walking, running, sports) and sedentary use (sitting, standing) while they were in public open spaces.
Our study’s contribution
We found that participants on average spent about 70% of the time in public open spaces being active, while 30% was spent being sedentary. The proportion of active use is much higher than that reported in studies from Western countries but similar to that reported in China and Thailand. We also found that women and older adults were less likely to be active compared to their counterparts.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The findings of this study suggest that public open spaces in Asian countries can contribute to public health through promoting physical activity. Public health initiatives to encourage more people to visit public open spaces and environmental initiatives to create more open spaces can help to increase physical activity in these countries.
Further information
Full research article:
Active and sedentary use of public open spaces in Asian countries by Takemi Sugiyama, Masaaki Sugiyama, Elizabeth Carig, Dyanika Nolasco, Walid Hossain, Abdus Subhan Mollick and Tapan Kumar Nath.
Related posts
Our systematic review of the impacts of neighbourhood design on well-being found strong evidence linking design principles such as walkability and access to green space with health and well-being.
This paper investigates how the project development of Wapping Wharf in Bristol impacted the dwellers’ well-being. It finds that the relationship between urban placemaking and dwellers’ wellbeing is not just constitutive, but also mutually reinforcing.
For city planners and policymakers, increasing the tree canopy coverage stands out as the most promising green infrastructure planning/management strategies to contribute to health of campus communities/users. The tree canopy data are also more widely available than most other green infrastructure variables, making its use for the purpose of monitoring, intervention, and assessment feasible for various stakeholders.
