City Know-hows
Our cross-sectional study of 272 neighbourhoods of thirteen cities shows that diverse physical and social attributes of neighbourhoods influence mental well-being of the citizens in the Asia and Africa.
Share
Target audience
Urban Planners in the study cities, UN-Habitat, National policy makers and cities in the Global South.
The problem
Although the role of space and place are well understood in the Western academic literatures on health, Southern academic literature is inadequate, cross-sectional studies do little to recognise this nexus. This gap in the literature needs to be filled to promote neighbourhood- and place-focused health planning.
What we did and why
Our paper highlights the issue that there are notable links between neighbourhood (as a place) with mental health. In addition, a comparative analysis demonstrates similarities and dissimilarities among different cities, continents and contexts. This advances arguments in favour of acknowledging the role of geographic influences on the neighbourhood effects which influcence mental health.
Our study’s contribution
Our study recognises the influential neighbourhood effects on health outcomes in Southern context. The conclusions drawn in this study is unique and will provide future guidelines for neighbourhood health policies and research.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our arguments in this paper are founded on large sample size across 13 Southern cities. There are strong arguments in favour of contributory impact of the neighbourhood planning for heath, policy makers pleaze take note. We have also identified a number of key influencers from this research, these will help policymakers in identifying the priority areas urban health planning for cities in the Global South.
Further information
An exhibition that highlighted urban issues of Dhaka. Some of the works here featured the mental health challenges at individual and city level.
Full research article:
The neighbourhood effect on mental well-being in the Global South by Shilpi Roy and Tanjil Sowgat
Related posts
Examining the urban environment is critical for enhancing mental well-being, necessitating the identification of relevant indicators to inform strategic interventions aimed at improving mental health outcomes.
Anthropogenic climate change is bringing with it a whole host of deleterious public health impacts. People will die and suffer disproportionately following inequitable societal structures. With every passing year time to mitigate and adapt to anthropogenic climate change slips away. The time is now to deliberately plan for the health impacts that are now ‘baked in’ for centuries to come.
Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.
