City Know-hows
The study highlights the potential of residential gardens to contribute to London’s ecological goals. Collaboration with conservation organisations focusing on those with larger gardens who are older could enhance urban rewilding efforts.
Share
Target audience
City sustainability and biodiversity officers and leads; Urban wildlife interests.
The problem
Gardening for wildlife supports local ecosystems, enhances urban green spaces, and creates wildlife corridors, however, little is known on the demographic factors that potentially influence this behaviour. To influence behaviour, it is important to first understand behaviour.
What we did and why
We wanted to understand the types of gardening for wildlife taking place in London’s private gardens and the influence of demographic factors on the likelihood to garden for wildlife. We sent out a digital questionnaire to ask Londoners about their gardening for wildlife practices and their age, gender, ethnicity, religious beliefs, occupation, household income, accommodation type, home ownership status, garden type, shared garden or not, dependents, and conservation-organisation membership status.
Our study’s contribution
Our study advances understanding of gardening for wildlife by residents with privuiate gardens n the city. Providing food (53%), water (50%), and homes for wildlife (47%) are common practices. Creating habitat corridors (29%) and nature-friendly gardening (37%) are less common. Note that conservation organisation membership and garden size are significantly associated with gardening for wildlife.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This study advances understanding of the behaviours related to gardening for wildlife. Our findings highlight the role of specific demographic factors. By aligning interventions with the study’s insights, local-decision makers such as city officers and urban leaders with relevant remits can harness the potential of residential gardens to enhance biodiversity, mitigate climate change, and foster deeper connections between city residents and nature, bringing health benefits.
A focus on conservation organisation members with larger gardens could enhance biodiversity, help to mitigate climate change, and foster deeper connections with nature, bringing health benefits.
Further information
Full research article:
[OPEN ACCESS] Wild ways: a cross-sectional study investigating gardening for wildlife in London’s private residential gardens by Justin Webb, Siân Moxon and & Alexandros Semertzi.
Related posts
In informal settlements, the impact of COVID-19 can be alarmingly severe due to the lack/limited access to infrastructure, densely populated living conditions, and pre-existing socio-economic inequalities. There are limited studies that synthesise evidence from the literature on the COVID-19 lived experiences of informal settlement dwellers, often overlooked in scientific studies and policy-making initiatives. There any knowledge gaps that require further research to enhance the development of context-specific policies towards effective pandemic planning and response. How can we build resilience and sustainable livelihoods in informal settlements during public health emergencies?
Before COVID-19, we freely used lively streets and public spaces. The pandemic emptied them and changed how people perceived urban life. Places once full of joy became empty and fearful. Our study examines COVID-19’s impact on three key dimensions of urban design and offers lessons for building healthier, more resilient cities.
To work for the Right to Walk the City is to advocate for health and social justice. Public Health as a multidisciplinary action is fundamental to achieve that goal. The ‘15-minute city’ model exemplifies this approach but remains hindered by barriers such as inadequate infrastructure and social discrimination, limiting walkability for underserved communities.
