Menu
City Know-hows
Differences in walking behaviour among racial groups highlight systemic inequalities that affect how and why people walk, pointing to broader issues of transportation and urban planning inequities.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, public health officials, nonprofit organization leaders
The problem
Walking habits for transportation differ among racial groups in the United States. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic people tend to walk more and for longer durations than Non-Hispanic Whites, possibly due to limited transportation options. This raises concerns about underlying systemic inequalities and the need for better policies to improve transportation equity in underserved communities.
What we did and why
I analyzed data from the American Time Use Survey (2003-2019) to understand how walking habits for transportation differ among racial groups in the U.S. I used statistical models to compare the likelihood and duration of walking trips among Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White people. The goal was to uncover potential systemic inequalities and inform policies to improve transportation equity in underserved communities.
Our study’s contribution
Unlike previous inconclusive findings, this extensive analysis of national data highlights systemic inequalities in transportation, emphasizing the need for targeted policies to improve transportation equity and walkability in minority neighbourhoods.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The study suggests that policies should focus on improving transportation options and walkability in minority neighbourhoods to address systemic inequalities. Enhancing public transportation, pedestrian infrastructure, and safety can provide better mobility and access to opportunities for Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic communities. This approach can promote transportation equity and improve the quality of life for underserved populations.
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
We highlight the beneficial interactions of “sensescapes”, the combination of soundscapes and natural landscapes, on psycho-physiological health. Our work shows the significance of interdisciplinary urban design and planning in harnessing these benefits – to enhance health and urban sustainability through the integration of nature’s influences on the body and mind.
The future of workplaces now includes ‘remote’ for many, which has many health benefits. The future of ‘the office’ needs to evolve too and bringing more nature into the workplace is a healthy place to start.
The quality of life for autistic individuals is closely linked not only to societal attitudes and the level of support provided by local and national authorities but also to the spatial and formal aspects of their surrounding environment. A key question is: How can urban planners, architects, and decision-makers facilitate the creation of autism-friendly cities?
