Menu
City Know-hows
This study explores how urban playground design can either segregate or integrate children within the broader city fabric. By comparing Venice and Auckland, we illustrate how playgrounds in Venice encourage unstructured exploration, while those in Auckland limit engagement to isolated, structured zones. We propose strategies for urban design that foster inclusive and dynamic public spaces for children.
Share
Target audience
Architects, urban planners, and designers; Policymakers and decision-makers; Advocacy groups for child-friendly cities
The problem
Urban playgrounds are often designed to overemphasise safety, inadvertently creating spatial segregation. This limits children’s opportunities for exploration, temporary appropriation of spaces, and engagement with the socio-cultural dynamics of the city.
What we did and why
In our research, we compared playgrounds and public spaces in two distinct urban contexts,Venice and Auckland, to understand how design affects children’s interactions with their environments. Using the concept of temporary appropriation, the study highlights the importance of unstructured spaces in fostering children’s social and cognitive development.
Our study’s contribution
The findings advocate for hybrid playground designs that balance safety with exploration.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Based on our study, we recommend that cities need to:
Further information
Full research article:
From segregation to inclusion: children’s engagement in urban public spaces by Jose Antonio Lara-Hernandez
Related posts
Opportunities exist to influence the growth of secondary cities, home to most of the world’s urban population, in ways that maximise residents’ wellbeing as well as achieve sustainability goals. More research is required to understand how this can be achieved, in particular in relation to city governance.
Seven key urban health policy ideas were found in the planning of Sydney’s Western Parkland City that draw upon different ontological perspectives. This case study prompts policy actors and researchers to reflect on their own assumptions, and others’ underlying assumptions to better understand where and how collaborations should occur.
Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.
