City Know-hows
We evaluated four case studies from Europe and the Middle East with a qualitative method. In this study, walkable areas in four cities, Amman, Turin, Mahabad, and Sawbridgeworth, with their citizens, were studied. By visiting these spaces, recording personal experiences, photographing, and interviewing citizens, their roles in walkability and improving citizens’ rights, health, and climate challenges were identified.
Share
Target audience
Policymakers, municipalities, city planners, public health officials, community leaders, Climate activists, Health activists, Social rights activists.
The problem
Many studies so far have tried to show the positive outcomes with different quantitative and qualitative analyses worldwide. However, there are few studies that focus on citizens’ points of view and how they experience these positive outcomes. Our study aims to fill this gap.
What we did and why
We shared our story from studying walkable spaces with photos and then asked users about the role of space in their lives from three viewpoints: citizens’ rights, health, and climate. We did this to positively engage with people in these walkable spaces. We were able to better understand the impact of walkable cities from their perspective. We argue that analyzing walkable spaces from the citizen’s view can open new and different perspectives.
Our study’s contribution
Our findings provide valuable insight of local perspective from four different locations with respect to the role of walkable spaces, and how important it is to see cities through the citizens’ lens. We found that, Amman and Sawbridgeworth had the best conditions for health benefits and community involvement, suggesting that their city designs had effectively encouraged people to be active and to interact socially. We show that designing walkable cities can change people’s perception of space and have positive effects.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Design and planning walkable cities need to involve citizens. There is a potential to enhance health and safety for people (especially the vulnerable groups) by designing sustainable walkable spaces. Above all of that, prioritizing citizens’ needs, perceptions, and education toward walkable cities is vital in light of enhancing positive outcomes for climate, health and social rights.
Further information
Full research article:
Walkable cities for all: enhancing citizens’ rights, health, and climate adaptations by Borhan Sepehri, Mohammad Anvar Adibhesami, Rosalina Gadyuchkova, Alaa Ababneh and Amirmohamad Parvanehdehkordi
Related posts
Improper solid waste management causes significant environmental damage. In India, solid waste management is a major challenge, particularly for urban local bodies. While larger cities have access to sufficient funds to provide solid waste management services, smaller cities with limited resources struggle to sustain financially viable solid waste management operations. Consequently, solid waste often ends up in landfills, contaminating the environment instead of being processed effectively. At the same time, the excessive use of chemical fertilizers in agriculture degrades soil health and further contaminates the environment.
We explored the combined effects of housing affordability, quality, tenure, and neighbourhood conditions on mental health outcomes. We gathered data through a survey involving 470 questionnaires for analysis. We have been able to isolate what matters in relation to housing and mental health in our Iranian cohort.
Health impact assessments are a key tool to bridge the worlds of planning and health, but there’s a risk they become a ‘tick box’ exercise with little real-world benefit. Learning from recent practice in English local authorities can help maximise their effectiveness in producing healthier developments.
