City Know-hows
Resource scarcity demands a ‘health in all policies’ approach for inter-sectoral co-benefits and relational capacity building. In step, the financial support provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Climate Ready State and Cities Initiative is foundational. Many of the programs and practitioners would not exist without federal financial support and guidance. The plans and programs are built upon collaborative approaches to networks, knowledge, and actionable strategies.
Share
Target audience
Public Health Practitioners; Urban planners; Community organizations; Elected legislators
The problem
Anthropogenic climate change is bringing with it a whole host of deleterious public health impacts. People will die and suffer disproportionately following inequitable societal structures. With every passing year time to mitigate and adapt to anthropogenic climate change slips away. The time is now to deliberately plan for the health impacts that are now ‘baked in’ for centuries to come.
What we did and why
With over a decade of experience spanning diverse geographic, institutional, and political terrains, there is much insight the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s ‘Climate Ready States and Cities Initiative’ can provide regarding climate and health planning and implementation. We examined how grantees have extended their efforts into the creation and implementation of climate and health adaptation plans. These climate and health adaptation plans are the guiding foundational policy frameworks of collaboratively based adaptation actions spanning the country.
Our study’s contribution
To manoeuvrer through barriers, practitioners built and utilized strong networks of diverse partners and community collaborators to operationalize plan implementation, evaluation, and for future development. Collaborations and cross-boundary networks aided in the construction of:
• knowledge and data based in embodied societal phenomena,
• capacity for strategy implementation and programmatic reach,
• policy construction and plan refinement,
• asset-based collaborative networks and partnerships,
• strategies that are reflexive, and agile, when possible, strategies that are co-constructed with communities,
• monitoring and evaluation strategies that are more easily actualized, and the translation of climate models, disease burdens, and other scientific projections into observable understanding.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The practitioners we studied created and utilized collaborations that varied in purpose, but regardless, were highly generative of:
• contributing to the field’s understanding of best practices through research;
• creating co-benefits between climate, health, and other sectors;
• conducting surveillance to help fill or identify gaps in climate-related data;
• formulating appropriate health messaging for target populations; and aiding health service provision by external institutions.
Further information
Full research article:
Small steps creating larger impact: an investigation of Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE) plans and practitioners by Zechariah J. Lange, Emily Powell, Tisha J. Holmes, Autumn Locklear, Lauren Thie, Courtney Williams & Christopher K. Uejio
Related posts
Food behaviours are associated with diet quality, a major risk factor for chronic disease. We compared the food behaviours of house residents and apartment residents, and apartment residents by characteristic. We found significant differences in meal purchasing behaviours and consumption of fruit and vegetables, which have short- and long-term implications for dietary health.
Our study evaluates the reliability (consistency) of a local tool for measuring health determinants in public spaces, using a co-creation process with older adults living in care homes in Barcelona. It highlights the importance of inclusive urban planning and the varied perspectives of community members in enhancing urban health.
We wanted to understand the types of gardening for wildlife taking place in London’s private gardens and the influence of demographic factors on the likelihood to garden for wildlife. We sent out a digital questionnaire to ask Londoners about their gardening for wildlife practices and their age, gender, ethnicity, religious beliefs, occupation, household income, accommodation type, home ownership status, garden type, shared garden or not, dependents, and conservation-organisation membership status.
