Menu
City Know-hows
30 km/h speed zones have the potential to transform safety and liveability of local streets. However, there are numerous barriers to implementation. Leveraging a cross-country policy comparison between the state of Victoria, Australia, and British Columbia, Canada, we identified that despite significant appetite for change in Victoria, Australia, implementation was hamstrung by modifiable limitations in policy and policy reform is urgently needed.
Share
Target audience
Policy Officers within State/Provincial and Local/Municipal Governments; State/Provincial Ministers in relevant fields (e.g. Transport, Health, Planning, Road Safety).
The problem
30 km/h speed zones are one of the most cost-effective road safety interventions to enhance safety and liveability of local streets. In the state of Victoria, Australia, only two have been implemented on a trial basis, and there is limited adoption across Australia.
What we did and why
We interviewed key government partners across Victoria, Australia and British Columbia, Canada (where 30 km/h speed zones have been implemented at scale) to identify critical barriers and enablers to successful implementation of 30 km/h. We used qualitative methods (interviews) to enable a deeper understanding of the relationships between barriers, and to explore new topics not previously considered through quantitative methods.
Our study’s contribution
This study provides critical insights into the complexity of implementing 30 km/h speeds, and opportunities to enhance systems to catalyse change. Specifically, we found that:
• There is appetite across levels of governments for 30 km/h speeds in Victoria, Australia, and this is hamstrung by amenable policy-barriers that only enable 30 km/h speeds to be implemented on a complex, resource intensive, trial basis.
• Limitations in existing policy create additional barriers, including limited local evidence about 30 km/h speeds.
Impacts for city policy and practice
There is significant potential for widespread uptake of 30 km/h speeds in Australia, and resulting health, mobility, environmental and equity outcomes. To enable this:
• Victorian state government policy reform is needed to enable easier implementation by local governments;
• Robust evaluation of 30 km/h speed zones that consider the wider potential outcomes (for example, on equity) would support further scaling;
• Implementation of 30 km/h speeds without infrastructure and other measures to create roads that look and feel like the implemented speed limit may cause tensions between enforcement and community sentiment;
• Equity-deserving areas should be prioritised for 30 km/h speed zones.
See also: 6th UN Global Road Safety Week – Streets for Life on the WHO website.
Further information
Full research article:
Cross-country policy comparison of 30 km/h speed limits by Lauren Pearson, Megan Oakey, Breanna Nelson, Mojgan Karbakhsh, Shazya Karmali & Ben Beck
Related posts
Australian pilot study finds a Healthy Urban Transition Tool can assess the liveability of urban environments and assist in transitioning neighborhoods towards improving the social determinants of health and health equity.
How can we design walkable streets that promote health through nature?
This scoping review synthesises international and cross-cultural research—drawing from English and Chinese studies—to clarify intervention types and health mechanisms, offering an essential evidence base for healthier, more connected urban environments. Our findings reframe streets as inclusive, restorative spaces for health—not just transport infrastructure.
Enhance cognitive health in older adult communities using the CAP approach: fostering Connectedness, feeling At home, and engaging in joyful Play. This community-centric model seeks to improve well-being and complements existing health resources systems, emphasizing the importance of building strong, supportive networks among older adults.
