Menu
City Know-hows
Well-planned cities and neighbourhoods are building blocks for health and wellbeing. Our study evaluated one approach that two English local government organisations took to facilitate healthier environments, in both ‘healthy places officers’ were employed to bridge the gap between planning and public health teams.
Share
Target audience
Public health professionals; Local authorities/officers; Urban/spatial planners
The problem
The places where we live, work and play can support or hinder our health and mental well-being but addressing these social determinants of health largely lies outside the remit of the health sector. Local government organisations play a key role in developing environments that promote health through responsibilities for planning and other relevant functions. However, such organisations do not always have the capacity and time to support planning and public health teams to work together.
What we did and why
We undertook an evaluation of healthy places officers employed by two local government organisations located in a city and an area with a mix of rural and urban areas. We aimed to identify changes in workforce capacity and joint working linked to the investment in these dedicated posts. The research involved a documentary review of local government plans, as well as case studies, interviews, and diary keeping with practitioners.
Our study’s contribution
We found that the introduction of the roles provided time and expertise to forge connections between public health and policy areas related to planning for health such as food environments. The postholders also supported the development of workforce competencies by rolling out training on health impact assessment. We also identified some examples of local government plans that more explicitly recognised a link to health as a result of the postholders’ advice and input.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our findings can be used by other local authorities considering similar roles:
Further information
Full research article:
Building and facilitating systems capabilities for healthy environments: the role of dedicated ‘healthy places’ postholders by Emma Coombes, Georgia Spiliopoulos, Lourdes Madigasekera-Elliott, Becky Wilkinson, Jacqueline Cannon, Tracey Flitcroft, Sarah E. Rodgers & Emma Halliday
Related posts
Health evidence could be used more effectively to influence healthier urban development. We learn from a researcher-practitioner collaboration, involving an embedded researcher in local government working on a regeneration project, which helped to develop a new health modelling tool for environmental change and influence decision-making.
Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the built environment has an impact on people’s health, particularly in terms of noncommunicable diseases such as asthma, diabetes and poor mental health. However, health is rarely prioritised in urban planning decisions at present, and earlier work by this research group has shown that senior decision-makers feel they lack the power to influence planning and policy decisions in order to improve the situation. This intervention area adds to the wider research programme, which is focused primarily on the delivery of quantifiable socio-environmental and health economics valuations. People make decisions not just based on economic valuation, so an understanding of why people make decisions and how those decisions can change is essential. This paper describes the methodology that will be used to develop this intervention. Findings will be published later.
Urban environments influence mental health and development of younger populations. This study explores associations between adolescent mental health indicators and design characteristics. Implications include recommendations for planners and urban designer to promote psychological well-being.
