Menu
City Know-hows
Health evidence could be used more effectively to influence healthier urban development. We learn from a researcher-practitioner collaboration, involving an embedded researcher in local government working on a regeneration project, which helped to develop a new health modelling tool for environmental change and influence decision-making.
Share
Target audience
Urban development practitioners, academic funders for health and planning
The problem
Health evidence doesn’t effectively influence urban development decision-making. Although there is evidence showing how environmental features can influence health risks, urban development too often results in unhealthy environments.
What we did and why
We used an embedded researcher to collaborate with practitioners on a regeneration project who bridged between academics and practitioners to provide contextually relevant health evidence to influence the development of a regeneration spatial framework. This helped develop a new health modelling tool demonstrating impacts of health from environmental change.
Our study’s contribution
We demonstrate the value of showing contextually relevant health evidence to influence urban development decision-making. Health evidence was used to: highlight problems; support good/aspirational solutions; and consider trade-offs in a complex system. This should be recognised to ensure evidence is appropriate for different purposes.
Embedded research is an emerging approach and this study demonstrates its value to support researcher-practitioner collaborations to understand a complex system and develop impactful, timely interventions for healthier place-making.
Summary briefing notes about this study: Using-health-evidence-to-influence-urban-regeneration-in-Bristol-1.pdf
Summary briefing note about the HAUS modelling tool: Valuing-the-external-social-costs-of-unhealthy-urban-developments-1.pdf
TRUUD study. Research about healthy urban development, which this study was part of: https://truud.ac.uk/
Impacts for city policy and practice
A new health modelling tool was piloted in this study. The academic-practitioner partnership helped academics understand a complex system and provided contextually relevant evidence for practitioners to: highlight problems; support good/aspirational solutions; and consider trade-offs.
It shows its value to demonstrate contextually relevant health evidence to influence healthier urban development. More collaborations between public health and urban development sectors could improve the influence of health evidence on urban development decision-making.
Further information
Full research article:
 Using health evidence to influence healthier urban development: A qualitative evaluation of a researcher–practitioner collaboration by Anna Le Gouais, Eleanor Eaton, Katharine Hanss, and Judi Kidger
Related posts
Our Jerusalem Railway Park study addressed the needs of those aged 55 in disparate communities, with long-term implications for physical and mental health, and community
Our study introduces and reviews how the built environment and its relation to population health are assessed in the literature. We did this by identifying methodological shortcomings and research potentials that need to be addressed jointly. Our assessment aims to undertake multiple health issues in an integrated manner, and identify priorities within the city whereby health is a primary goal.
Building place attachment and sense of community through design can improve community well-being, yet reviews on this topic are lacking. This manuscript presents a systematic review of the links between pedestrian designs and place attachment and sense of community, and also highlights several health equity considerations to encourage new ideas about inclusive and healthy urban design practice and study.
