City Know-hows
Target audience
Policy-makers and developers interested in designing high performance communal spaces in apartment buildings.
The problem
In the context of global urbanisation, creating high-density living environments that promote health, wellbeing and social connectedness is vital. In apartment buildings, residents live in close physical proximity and share communal areas, however not all areas are equal in design and quality, which may impact usage and opportunities for social interaction.
What we did and why
We developed and compared an on-the-ground and desktop approach to auditing communal area design and quality. The Communal Areas Audit Tool (CAAT) and Communal Areas Desktop Audit Tool (CADAT), which measured design features that can impact residents use of (and interaction within) communal areas, were assessed for reliability and validity.
Our study’s contribution
Our work appears to be the first attempt to develop objective audit tool(s) that systematically and consistently assess a number of design themes across communal areas.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The application of the Communal Areas Desktop Audit Tool would be highly relevant for large-scale data collection in studies examining the intersection between high-density apartment living, the provision and quality of communal areas and residents’ social outcomes. Note, this may become increasingly important in rapidly densifying cities.
Further information
Full research article:
Communal area design in apartment buildings: development and comparison of a desktop and on-the-ground landscape assessment tool by Alexandra Kleeman, Lucy Gunn, Billie Giles-Corti & Sarah Foster.
Related posts
Exploring complete streets implementation in knowledge production territories, this research examines the potentials and limitations of using campuses as living labs, applying tactical urbanism. It identifies the opportunities for enhancing walkability and inclusivity and the challenges, e.g. regulatory issues and limited funding, stressing the role of governance and community engagement.
This newly developed methodological approach aims to identify the underlying causes of stress in urban environments. To this end, it analyses a broad spectrum of perception-related factors from various fields to capture the full complexity of human perception in a more holistic manner. The evaluation of five case studies using the so-called ‘Stressor Matrices’ serves as the basis for deriving initial hypotheses about the triggers of urban stress.
Our study is meant as a provocation for planners to “start walking again” and understand sites, places, and context by observing and listening. Walking is a way to collect diverse stakeholders’ insights and expands a vision. Walking is a cry for sustainability.
