City Know-hows
Dutch adults often use different food retailers than the geographically nearest, and distance to food retailers is not associated with snack food consumption. As such, policies to make cities healthier with respect to fast food outlets should perhaps not be distance-based.
Share
Target audience
Community advocates, municipal policy officers, public health and planning policy-makers
The problem
Food retailer access can be defined through distance-based metrics (i.e., distance to the nearest supermarket) or density-based metrics (i.e., number of fast food outlets in a given area). International studies suggest that density-based metrics are typically favoured over distance-based metrics. However, this may depend on the local context and type of food retailer. Local policymakers aiming to make the food environment of their city healthier need such contextual information.
What we did and why
We focused on the Netherlands, one of the most densely populated countries in the world. For a large group of Dutch adults, we compared the location of the nearest supermarket, discount supermarket and fast food restaurant with the location of these food retailer types that they reported to use in practice. We also explored whether distance to the nearest food retailer was associated with snack food consumption, and whether any observed link would be explained by people’s awareness and use of the available food retailers.
Our study’s contribution
In the Dutch context, adults typically use a different food outlet than the geographically nearest. This was most prominently visible for fast food outlets and less so for discount supermarkets and regular supermarkets. While distance to food outlets was not linked to snack food consumption, perceived availability and use of fast food outlets and regular supermarkets was linked to higher fast food consumption.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Cities considering zoning policies may want to distinguish between different types of food retailers, whereby distance-based policies may be appropriate for supermarkets and discount supermarkets, while restrictions on fast food outlets may need to be based on other metrics than proximity.
More information about our research group: The Upstream Team
Further information
Full research article:
[OPEN ACCESS] The importance of availability of, proximity to, and use of food retailers in relation to snack consumption – a cross-sectional mediation analysis in the Eet & Leef study by Mariane de Almeida Alves, Maria Gabriela Matias de Pinho & Joreintje D. Mackenbach.
Related posts
We took a significant step in identifying the existing gaps in knowledge translation for healthy cities and adopting a proactive approach to laying out opportunities for improvement. By developing a visual representation for a renewed conceptual framework, we provide a clear and insightful tool for planners, designers, and policymakers aiming to enhance knowledge translation processes. As a result, this study not only elevates knowledge translation as a field of study for urban professionals but also reinforces its importance in public health.
Health impact assessments are a key tool to bridge the worlds of planning and health, but there’s a risk they become a ‘tick box’ exercise with little real-world benefit. Learning from recent practice in English local authorities can help maximise their effectiveness in producing healthier developments.
We explored the combined effects of housing affordability, quality, tenure, and neighbourhood conditions on mental health outcomes. We gathered data through a survey involving 470 questionnaires for analysis. We have been able to isolate what matters in relation to housing and mental health in our Iranian cohort.
