Menu
City Know-hows
City makers need to stop making cities for ‘normal’ circumstances. Cities are liveable only when they can respond and reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change.
Share
Target audience
City-makers and urban policymakers
The problem
The Covid-19 Pandemic revealed the deficiency of the current planning systems in coping with disturbances and the inability of cities to maintain their level of liveability during the time of crises. Traditional interpretations of liveability tend to emphasise the quality of life, health and wellbeing of communities under ‘normal’ circumstances, and disregard the impacts of unexpected shocks and disturbances on cities.
What we did and why
The research focused on understanding the interface between the concepts of liveability and resiliency. The question for this paper is: ‘How can we plan liveable cities that are resilient to shocks, such as the Covid-19 pandemic?’
Our study’s contribution
The research highlighted the importance of integrating the concept of resiliency into liveability to develop cities that can sustain their liveability over time, specifically when disruptions happen. Cities need to increase their capacity to not only absorb shocks and respond quickly, but also, reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change. We need urban policies and plans that enable cities to adapt, survive and thrive and maintain the quality of life, health and wellbeing of citizens during and after crises.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Urban planning and policy needs to address the institutionalised inequities built into our cities through ‘local living’. Planning sustained liveable cities also requires to:
• Be ‘people centred’
• Apply ‘Integrated long-term planning’,
• Be ‘responsive and adaptable’,
• Ensure ‘future-proofing’
• Promote ‘sustainable development’
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
Unveiling the hidden truth behind open defecation in Delhi, this study exposes the role of infrastructural incapacity and institutional failure. With 80% of surveyed households’ still practicing open defecation, the findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive policies to address the inadequacy of public and household facilities, water availability, and coordination among governmental bodies.
Interventions on riverfronts require close consideration of contextual ecological and social aspects. We adopted a research-by-design process to discuss nature-inspired urban design strategies in an Irish context.
• We conducted a desk study of academic literature and urban policies to establish the suitability of various methods for the site characteristics;
• We performed site analyses (site observations, footfall counting, photographic documentation) for an in-depth understanding of the existing conditions. We developed urban design scenarios to envision potential approaches, on which public feedback was sought.
Autism inclusive urban environments design principles to support sensory and cognitive navigation.
