City Know-hows
Although the CASE and MAPs were supposed to be temporary shelters for displaced persons, after fourteen years, they have not received proper maintenance and are dilapidated. This scenario opens to the idea that living in these places could negatively affect different psychological aspects, including perceived urban quality and environmental well-being.
Share
Target audience
City officers, urban leaders, and professions in urban and environmental policy
The problem
After the earthquake that struck L’Aquila city, Italy, on 6 April 2009 there were projects for emergency shelter. MAPs (Moduli Abitativi Provvisori) provided temporary housing modules and CASE (Complessi Antisismici Sostenibili ed Ecocompatibili) built sustainable and environmentally friendly anti-seismic complexes. Although the CASE and MAPs were supposed to be temporary shelters for displaced persons, after fourteen years, they have not received proper maintenance and are dilapidated. This situation could affect inhabitants’ urban quality and environmental well-being.
What we did and why
Given that the negative structural conditions affecting the two main types of emergency housing in L’Aquila, such as MAPs and CASE projects, we evaluated perceived urban quality and environmental well-being in a sample of 100 inhabitants.
Our study’s contribution
Our study provides an innovative perspective on the critical situation involving the MAPs and CASE projects addressing different individual factors, including age, quality of life, and environmental well-being, after an emergency such as the L’Aquila earthquake of 6 April 2009.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The current research highlights the need to reframing residential and urban environmental objective to include the consideration of psychological features. This could better safeguard overall well-being across the life span of any ‘temporary’ emergency dwellings, and potentially for a long time after the emergency.
Further information
Full research article:
Perceived urban quality and environmental well-being during the post-earthquake in the emergency housing of L’Aquila by Enrico Perilli, Danilo Bontempo, Matteo Perazzini, Martina Bucci, Rosa Anna Passaretti, and Marco Giancola.
Related posts
Poorly designed neighbourhood outdoor spaces can harm citizens’ mental health, such as presenting them with information overload, crowding or low exposure to nature. Our research explored which design elements can support urban designers in designing neighbourhood outdoor spaces that can reduce stress and attention fatigue and improve the mental health of all citizens.
This pioneering study on healthy and sustainable indicators for Jakarta is the first in Indonesia to use the Global Healthy and Sustainable City Indicators framework. As the most populous city in Indonesia and Southeast Asia, Jakarta’s inclusion provides valuable insights into its status compared to 25 international cities. We offer a critical perspective on existing spatial indicators, highlighting the need for precise definitions and careful interpretation within the city’s local context. Additionally, we propose new indicators to help policymakers and public health officials develop more adaptable measures for urban health and sustainability.
The ‘runnability of cities’ as a novel spatial planning approach can enhance healthier and more enabling environments for everyone.
