City Know-hows
While cities offer unprecedented opportunities for social mobility, their distinctive physical form can generate significant stress on residents. We propose the urban stress model which reorients urban public health approaches by emphasizing how chronic stress disrupts biological functions and leads to poor health with an application to the global diabetes crisis.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, city political leaders, city mayors, city departments of health, city transportation leaders, urban labor unions, city housing agencies, city parks and recreation agencies
The problem
The world is experiencing an escalating diabetes crisis. It is well-known that diabetes is associated with both urbanization and stress. However, causal explanations for these associations are not well-understood. Comprehensive conceptual frameworks are needed to outline why and how urban living increases risk of diabetes and how stress plays a causal role. This knowledge is the foundation for the design of cities that promote health and support the development of sustainable interventions that can curb the growth of diabetes worldwide.
What we did and why
We present a novel conceptual framework called the Urban Stress Model, which intentionally crosses disciplinary boundaries. We suggest that the unique physical form of cities contributes to an increased stress burden through the interacting influences of daily urban hazards and social disadvantage. We use New York City as a case example because of its high diabetes rates and its legacy of unequal healthcare in the context of concentrated wealth. Therefore, New York City can provide valuable insights for newly developing urban centers worldwide confronting similar challenges and growing social and health inequality.
Our study’s contribution
The Urban Stress Model is novel because we provide a specific mechanistic framework that explains how urban form translates into biological dysfunction through stress pathways.
Impacts for city policy and practice
The Urban Stress Model highlights that stress reduction should be a central consideration in urban health equity initiatives, as disadvantaged populations often face compounding stressors that contribute to health inequities, including the unequal burden of diabetes. Future public health and city improvement initiatives must approach the major urban health challenges of our time with multi-level strategies—from workplace policies to neighborhood design—that target stress reduction alongside traditional risk factors.
For further information, visit the Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health
Further information
Full research article:
[OPEN ACCESS] The Urban Stress Model: a framework for understanding the persistence of health disparities in cities by Aimee Afable, Greg Rybarczyk, Bianca D. Rivera & Paul Landsbergis
Related posts
Our study provides valuable insights by examining the obstacles and viewpoints regarding vertical greenery systems in Delhi. It highlights the technical challenges as significant adoption barriers among built environment professionals. Emphasizing the pivotal role of vertical greenery in climate change mitigation, this research advocates for further scholarly investigation and evidence-based policy formulation. This deepened understanding supports the seamless integration of vertical greenery systems into urban landscapes, fostering sustainability and resilience.
Study shows the Flint, Michigan water crisis may spur additional population losses for the city.
For city planners and policymakers, increasing the tree canopy coverage stands out as the most promising green infrastructure planning/management strategies to contribute to health of campus communities/users. The tree canopy data are also more widely available than most other green infrastructure variables, making its use for the purpose of monitoring, intervention, and assessment feasible for various stakeholders.
