City Know-hows
Target audience
Urban planners, policy-makers and public health practitioners.
The problem
In response to concerns over social isolation and loneliness in cities—which intensified in the wake of COVID-19; promoting social connectedness came to the forefront of urban health agendas worldwide. Despite this policy attention, social connectedness is not consistently defined or measured in urban health research. Hence, inconsistencies create confusion for planners and policy makers looking for evidence-informed guidance on how to understand, monitor, and intervene on social connectedness.
What we did and why
Clarifying social connectedness for urban health research and policy is crucial to interpreting and advancing evidence on its role in the development of healthy cities.
With this purpose in mind, we set out to delineate the concept of social connectedness, including its meaning, measurement, and relationship to neighbourhoods and health. Our approach draws from the latest public health and urban planning research, along with a selection of older influential works.
Our study’s contribution
This paper synthesizes a vast body of evidence on social connectedness into a useful conceptual primer for urban health researchers, planners, and policymakers. It presents:
a pragmatic framework of key definitions and metrics for operationalizing social connectedness,
an adapted model for exploring potential pathways between neighbourhood environments, social connectedness, and health,
Impacts for city policy and practice
With more consistent and comprehensive measurement in place, population health and urban planning research can advance evidence on the link between urban environments, social connectedness, and health; in turn helping cities to identify and scale effective interventions.
Our primer supports this work, while offering a vocabulary and set of metrics for social connectedness that city planners and policymakers can use to inform ongoing policy dialogue, action, and evaluation in their cities.
Further information
Interventions, Research, and Action in Cities Team (INTERACT): A pan-Canadian collaboration of scientists, urban planners, public health practitioners and community partners uncovering the impact of urban changes on health and equity.
Full research article:
Situating social connectedness in healthy cities: a conceptual primer for research and policy by Meridith Sones (@merisones), Caislin L. Firth, Daniel Fuller, Meg Holden, Yan Kestens and Meghan Winters.
Related posts
Walking is a forgotten aspect of urban communication. Walking provides places of interaction and is revealing of the relationship between citizens and politics.
Increasing the availability of urban green spaces, even small pocket green spaces, should be considered a promising intervention for reducing depression among older individuals. Beyond 100m, urban green space protection diminishes. WHO recommends that the population have a green space within a 300m radius. However, for older people, this threshold may be too distant.
However, not all green spaces confer mental health benefits; therefore, researchers and professionals should consider the differential effects of different categories of greenery.
What makes a city truly happy? Drawing on research from nine global megacities, this study identifies the most important factors that foster happiness in urban public spaces. Put these 18 evidence-based criteria to work and transform your city’s streets, parks, and squares.
