Menu
City Know-hows
This study presents 20 key insights into the walking experiences of people living with dementia, highlighting shared priorities like safety and subgroup-specific needs. These findings offer actionable strategies for designing dementia-friendly neighborhoods that enhance mobility, inclusion, and well-being.
Share
Target audience
• Urban planners and city designers: Professionals responsible for shaping the physical and social fabric of cities, ensuring neighborhoods are inclusive, accessible, and safe for all residents.
• Public health policymakers: Decision-makers focused on advancing health equity and well-being, particularly for aging populations and people living with dementia.
• Community-based organizations supporting aging populations: Organizations advocating for dementia-friendly initiatives, promoting accessibility, and fostering social inclusion at the local level.
The problem
We observed that many urban environments fail to accommodate the mobility and safety needs of people living with dementia. Challenges such as inaccessible infrastructure, unclear wayfinding systems, and a lack of inclusive spaces hinder their independence and quality of life. Our study addresses these gaps by exploring the experiences of people living with dementia, identifying shared priorities and subgroup-specific needs to guide the design of dementia-friendly neighborhoods that foster mobility and inclusion.
What we did and why
We explored the walking experiences of 26 people living with dementia through sit-down, walk-along, and follow-up interviews in Metro Vancouver. Using a novel methodology, we uncovered shared priorities, subgroup-specific needs, environmental barriers and facilitators, and the coping strategies employed by participants. Our goal was to identify key insights from participants’ perspectives to serve as the foundation for actionable strategies in designing dementia-friendly neighborhoods that support mobility, safety, and inclusion.
Our study’s contribution
Our study provides critical insights into the walking experiences of people living with dementia, highlighting shared priorities and subgroup-specific needs. These findings contribute to dementia-friendly neighborhood design by:
• Identifying environmental barriers and facilitators to mobility and safety.
• Highlighting coping strategies employed by individuals across diverse sociodemographic groups.
• Offering actionable recommendations for inclusive urban design, such as memory-triggering landmarks, accessible sidewalks, and culturally inclusive public spaces.
These insights bridge research and practice for creating supportive communities.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Our findings offer practical guidance for city leaders and urban planners to create dementia-friendly neighborhoods that promote mobility, safety, and inclusion. Key recommendations include:
• Improving sidewalk accessibility, lighting, and maintenance to ensure safe and barrier-free pathways.
• Introducing memory-triggering landmarks and clear wayfinding systems to enhance navigation and reduce anxiety.
• Developing inclusive community spaces and programs that foster social interaction and cultural responsiveness.
These strategies aim to create equitable and supportive urban environments.
Further information
Full research article:
Twenty key insights into neighborhood walking experiences of people living with dementia in Metro Vancouver: a quantitative analysis of qualitative data by Mohammadjavad Nouri and Habib Chaudhury
Related posts
What makes a city truly happy? Drawing on research from nine global megacities, this study identifies the most important factors that foster happiness in urban public spaces. Put these 18 evidence-based criteria to work and transform your city’s streets, parks, and squares.
We live increasingly in cities, which paradoxically has positive and negative impacts on wellbeing. We review evidence for implementing aesthetics, as a factor that is considered when looking at the urban built environment, and its links to wellbeing. We summarise existing findings and provide a dataset to guide future research and urban planning.
There is limited evaluation of whether green space interventions lead to more people using these spaces. This is partly due to the difficulty of collecting data on visits to green spaces. Mobile phone data may offer one solution, but are rarely made available to researchers. As such, there is less examination of whether these data are valuable. We accessed small area anonymised mobile phone GPS data for Liverpool (2021-2022). Using a case study of wildflower planting, we identified green spaces where wildflowers were planted. A synthetic control was then constructed to identify similar green spaces where planting did not take place. We then compared the number of visits post-intervention between the intervention and control green sites. Our paper also gives an empirical and methodological evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using mobile phone data, which can inform others on how to best use them.
