City Know-hows

A holistic perspective in health-supportive design of future homes as informal offices

The expected rise of ‘working from home’ necessitates a deeper understanding of the cause and effect of home environment on physical, mental, and social health. By examining possible combination, we identified the pivotal role of improving architectural characteristics correlated with mental health, especially indoor environmental quality and socio-spatial features, prior to other indicators.

Share

Target audience

Architectural designers, policy makers, urban planners.

The problem

The expected rise of working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates a deeper understanding of the cause and effect of home environment on physical, mental, and social health. Existing research primarily focuses on physical and psychological health, with less attention given to social health. Incorporating social health is emphasized by various researchers during the pandemic. Moreover, the interconnected nature of health components suggests the possibility of mediation, requiring a model selection to represent the working from home situation.

What we did and why

We aimed to identify the working from home model and explore the direct and indirect effects of the built environment on health components. To accomplish this goal, we used three steps of analysis, including bivariate, multivariate, and PLS-SEM, to select the architectural characteristics specifically for the situation of working from home. Therefore, not only our results indicate the effect of the built environment on health, but also reveals the primacies in causation through exploring mediation models.

Our study’s contribution

We identified a combination that offers the most robust model for linking built environment features to health dimensions. Our findings showed the full mediation and sequential precedence of mental health prior to physical and social health in the working from home situation.

Impacts for city policy and practice

We have further elaborated the architectural design implications and the importance of creating health-supportive environments, primarily through improving indoor environmental quality and socio-spatial features. We also discussed how various features impact each health indicator.

Further information

Full research article:

Related posts

Maximising the health-promoting potential of public urban green spaces for sustainable urban development and public health, evidence from COVID-19

Prior studies have highlighted the vital role of urban green spaces in human health, showcasing benefits like stress reduction and improved well-being. Yet, the Covid-19 pandemic sparked increased interest in these spaces without any examination of how research priorities shifted. Understanding these changes is crucial as it may bias perspectives and policies, potentially affecting public health. Thus, uncovering shifts in research focus during and after the pandemic is imperative for informed planning and management.

Read More »

Hidden barriers: How citizen characteristics relate to perceived (un)availability of health promoting facilities

Significant health inequalities exist between neighbourhoods. Apart from differences in demographics, the neighbourhood environment including facilities has also been found to have a sizeable effect. Despite various health-promoting facilities being objectively available in neighbourhoods, not all citizens perceive them to be available to them. Therefore, some citizens might not make use of important facilities that improve their health. We need to know more about what predicts perceiving facilities as available besides them being objectively there.

Read More »