City Know-hows
The expected rise of ‘working from home’ necessitates a deeper understanding of the cause and effect of home environment on physical, mental, and social health. By examining possible combination, we identified the pivotal role of improving architectural characteristics correlated with mental health, especially indoor environmental quality and socio-spatial features, prior to other indicators.
Share
Target audience
Architectural designers, policy makers, urban planners.
The problem
The expected rise of working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates a deeper understanding of the cause and effect of home environment on physical, mental, and social health. Existing research primarily focuses on physical and psychological health, with less attention given to social health. Incorporating social health is emphasized by various researchers during the pandemic. Moreover, the interconnected nature of health components suggests the possibility of mediation, requiring a model selection to represent the working from home situation.
What we did and why
We aimed to identify the working from home model and explore the direct and indirect effects of the built environment on health components. To accomplish this goal, we used three steps of analysis, including bivariate, multivariate, and PLS-SEM, to select the architectural characteristics specifically for the situation of working from home. Therefore, not only our results indicate the effect of the built environment on health, but also reveals the primacies in causation through exploring mediation models.
Our study’s contribution
We identified a combination that offers the most robust model for linking built environment features to health dimensions. Our findings showed the full mediation and sequential precedence of mental health prior to physical and social health in the working from home situation.
Impacts for city policy and practice
We have further elaborated the architectural design implications and the importance of creating health-supportive environments, primarily through improving indoor environmental quality and socio-spatial features. We also discussed how various features impact each health indicator.
Further information
Full research article:
Exploring a representative model for associations between health dimensions and home as an informal office by Behnam Asadieh and Paulina Maria Neisch
Related posts
This research from Sydney shows the value of combining qualitative flexibility with systems thinking. Key contributions include: 1) Demonstrating how conversational, non-rigid methods reveal overlooked drivers of health and well-being. 2) Showing that human–environment systems perspectives add depth to urban health research. 3) Providing a never-before-used resident-centred approach for studying complex city living challenges.
Significant health inequalities exist between neighbourhoods. Apart from differences in demographics, the neighbourhood environment including facilities has also been found to have a sizeable effect. Despite various health-promoting facilities being objectively available in neighbourhoods, not all citizens perceive them to be available to them. Therefore, some citizens might not make use of important facilities that improve their health. We need to know more about what predicts perceiving facilities as available besides them being objectively there.
Exploring complete streets implementation in knowledge production territories, this research examines the potentials and limitations of using campuses as living labs, applying tactical urbanism. It identifies the opportunities for enhancing walkability and inclusivity and the challenges, e.g. regulatory issues and limited funding, stressing the role of governance and community engagement.
