City Know-hows
Can Safe Routes to School inadvertently fuel gentrification? This article explores how mobility infrastructure in Greenville’s West End reshapes communities, revealing the risks of cultural displacement and offering actionable strategies for urban practitioners to design equitable, context-sensitive interventions.
Share
Target audience
Urban planners, municipal policymakers, and Safe Routes to School coordinators.
The problem
We address the unintended consequences of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs in gentrifying neighborhoods, where mobility infrastructure often clashes with local cultural values and socioeconomic dynamics. In Greenville’s West End, such interventions risk displacing community traditions and accelerating demographic shifts. By overlooking the lived experiences of vulnerable residents, planners may inadvertently deepen inequities. Our work highlights the need for equity-focused design that aligns active mobility goals with the preservation of cultural and social cohesion.
What we did and why
We investigated how Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs intersect with gentrification in Greenville’s West End by using children’s active mobility as a lens to assess community perceptions. Through observations, behavior mapping, and interviews, we explored how mobility infrastructure impacts cultural traditions and socioeconomic dynamics. This approach allowed me to uncover tensions between design intentions and community realities, providing critical insights to guide equitable, context-sensitive urban planning in rapidly changing neighborhoods.
Our study’s contribution
This study challenges planners and designers to reconsider how mobility infrastructure can unintentionally exacerbate inequities in gentrifying neighborhoods. Our findings contribute to more equitable and context-sensitive urban practices by:
• Highlighting how mobility infrastructure risks cultural displacement and community fragmentation.
• Demonstrating the importance of aligning design goals with local cultural and social dynamics.
• Providing actionable insights for integrating community engagement into the planning of active mobility initiatives.
Impacts for city policy and practice
This study underscores the need for city policies and practices to prioritize equity and cultural preservation in mobility planning. Key implications include:
• Incorporating robust community engagement to ensure mobility infrastructure aligns with local values and needs.
• Evaluating the potential for displacement or cultural disruption when implementing active mobility initiatives.
• Designing flexible, equity-focused frameworks that balance accessibility and cultural preservation, ensuring vulnerable populations benefit from development without experiencing displacement or marginalization.
Further information
Full research article:
Unintended gentrification: community perspectives on children’s active mobility in the American South by Lyndsey Deaton & Zahra Ghazanfari
Related posts
Significant health inequalities exist between neighbourhoods. Apart from differences in demographics, the neighbourhood environment including facilities has also been found to have a sizeable effect. Despite various health-promoting facilities being objectively available in neighbourhoods, not all citizens perceive them to be available to them. Therefore, some citizens might not make use of important facilities that improve their health. We need to know more about what predicts perceiving facilities as available besides them being objectively there.
Air pollution kills. But who is most exposed to air pollution in a city? This paper explores how different workers in Bangkok are exposed to PM2.5, how they protect themselves (or not), and what this means for city planners.
What if urban health went beyond human wellness? Through our more-than-One Health conceptualization, we explored urban wild spaces as places where the health and flourishing of humans, animals, and ecosystems intertwine. This approach provides new insights into designing cities that are not just green, wild, but interconnected as restorative habitats for human and non-human health.
