City Know-hows
Our study is meant as a provocation for planners to “start walking again” and understand sites, places, and context by observing and listening. Walking is a way to collect diverse stakeholders’ insights and expands a vision. Walking is a cry for sustainability.
Share
Target audience
Everyone involved in spatial planning worldwide, but especially policy-makers and planners.
The problem
We want planners and decision-makers to get away from their computer screens and bring them into contact with the reality of everyday life, by going for intensive walks with local stakeholders. Walking is a temporary and light intervention in the landscape, but it is a radical activity that breaks with thinking in terms of the capitalist idiom of unlimited growth and exploitation.
What we did and why
We started this research because we observed several problems. There is a growing gap between urban and rural, which also translates into politics. Due to too much emphasis on urbanization and unbridled economic growth, multiple environmental and social-economic problems have arisen, especially in the countryside. This requires slowing down and reflection. That’s why we introduce walking as research method, especially intensive long-distance walks with one person as walking fellow, each time at least three hours.
Our study’s contribution
As far as is known, there has not yet been any research in rural areas in which walking is used as a method, at least not in the intensive manner that we propose and apply.
Impacts for city policy and practice
We have already received a lot of media attention (newspapers, radio, television, etc.) for our proposed approach, including supportive reactions from colleagues and academia worldwide. We believe that there is a great need for this now, especially considering geopolitical shifts (in which the urban-rural divide is central) and new technological developments that require researchers to reposition themselves.
Further information
Full research article:
[OPEN ACCESS] Making time to walk again: (re)introducing walking as an inclusive research method in spatial planning by Zef Hemel, Harry den Hartog & Gamze Saygi
Related posts
This research from Sydney shows the value of combining qualitative flexibility with systems thinking. Key contributions include: 1) Demonstrating how conversational, non-rigid methods reveal overlooked drivers of health and well-being. 2) Showing that human–environment systems perspectives add depth to urban health research. 3) Providing a never-before-used resident-centred approach for studying complex city living challenges.
Air pollution threatens public health globally. Our exposure to air pollution is influenced by transport. Transport is both a prominent source of air pollution and an important determinant in our exposure to it. The built and natural environment also dictate how, when and where we travel, and what we are exposed to. We provide a comprehensive review of these relationships and their interactions.
The world is currently responding to the climate crisis and the nature crisis as if they were separate challenges. This is a dangerous mistake. The are leading to dire impacts for our health
