Menu
City Know-hows
City makers need to stop making cities for ‘normal’ circumstances. Cities are liveable only when they can respond and reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change.
Share
Target audience
City-makers and urban policymakers
The problem
The Covid-19 Pandemic revealed the deficiency of the current planning systems in coping with disturbances and the inability of cities to maintain their level of liveability during the time of crises. Traditional interpretations of liveability tend to emphasise the quality of life, health and wellbeing of communities under ‘normal’ circumstances, and disregard the impacts of unexpected shocks and disturbances on cities.
What we did and why
The research focused on understanding the interface between the concepts of liveability and resiliency. The question for this paper is: ‘How can we plan liveable cities that are resilient to shocks, such as the Covid-19 pandemic?’
Our study’s contribution
The research highlighted the importance of integrating the concept of resiliency into liveability to develop cities that can sustain their liveability over time, specifically when disruptions happen. Cities need to increase their capacity to not only absorb shocks and respond quickly, but also, reflect on and learn from disruptions and consequently adapt and change. We need urban policies and plans that enable cities to adapt, survive and thrive and maintain the quality of life, health and wellbeing of citizens during and after crises.
Impacts for city policy and practice
Urban planning and policy needs to address the institutionalised inequities built into our cities through ‘local living’. Planning sustained liveable cities also requires to:
• Be ‘people centred’
• Apply ‘Integrated long-term planning’,
• Be ‘responsive and adaptable’,
• Ensure ‘future-proofing’
• Promote ‘sustainable development’
Further information
Full research article:
Related posts
There is limited evaluation of whether green space interventions lead to more people using these spaces. This is partly due to the difficulty of collecting data on visits to green spaces. Mobile phone data may offer one solution, but are rarely made available to researchers. As such, there is less examination of whether these data are valuable. We accessed small area anonymised mobile phone GPS data for Liverpool (2021-2022). Using a case study of wildflower planting, we identified green spaces where wildflowers were planted. A synthetic control was then constructed to identify similar green spaces where planting did not take place. We then compared the number of visits post-intervention between the intervention and control green sites. Our paper also gives an empirical and methodological evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of using mobile phone data, which can inform others on how to best use them.
Odour pollution impacts our mental and physical wellbeing without being noticed very often – bad smells can have a negative impact on how we think and feel. Bad odour can affect our work and home environments in a negative way so why don’t we take it more seriously?
Solid waste production is rapidly increasing in Kenyan cities. However, the implementation of available policies to address the canker leaves much to be desired.
