The book “How to Study Public Life” by Gehl and Svarre is the core of this study. Tehran’s public life during the pandemic and after that was thoroughly reviewed and analyzed through Gehl and Svarre’s lens.

Share

Target audience

Urban planners; urban designers; policymakers; municipalities; city planners, public health officials, and community leaders.

The problem

The importance of the methods used by Gehl and Svarre is fading away. Simultaneously, there was an obvious lack of deep understanding of public life in Tehran during the pandemic and post-pandemic.

What we did and why

We linked the gaps in understanding of public life in Tehran during the pandemic and post-pandemic using the analytics methods used by Gehl and Svarre. As such, we employed Behavioral Counting, Travel Mapping, Photography, and Field Diaries to address Gehl and Svarre’s primary inquiry: How many? Who? Where? What? How long? These were used in 7 popular urban public spaces which were hot spots for Tehrani citizens.

Our study’s contribution

Our work shows the suitability of using Gehl and Svarre methods even during unexpected situations like the pandemic to study public life. Furthermore, the results provide a comprehensive view of public life in Tehran which has not been done before. This study shows the importance of plazas and urban green spaces during the pandemic for maintaining the public life and people’s physical activity.

Impacts for city policy and practice

We recommend that researchers, urbanists, and policymakers consider and apply Gehl and Svarre’s methods more extensively and across various cities in their future studies. These would better enable them to design and plan for humans, which ultimately increase the resilience of cities. Specifically, our local study found that Tehran needs more walkable spaces that reduce cars’ domination and empower local economy, which is essential for public life.

Further information

Full research article:

‘How to study public life’ during pandemic and beyond: an inspiration from Gehl and Svarre in Tehran by Borhan Sepehri, Ayyoob Sharifi, MohammadReza Pourjafar, Ehsan Ranjbar, Mohammad Anvar Adibhesami & Saeed Makaremi

Related posts

How do high-rise communal spaces shape residents’ social interactions?

High-rise apartment buildings are increasingly popular in large cities, however, urban land availability for outdoor communal spaces is limited. Creating communal spaces for high population density is a challenging task. Past research indicates the importance of the immediate environment in stimulating social interaction and the spatial organization for social activities can play an important role. One may ask whether the design of communal spaces within high-rise buildings can stimulate social interaction among residents.

Read More »

Bridging mobility and equity: Rethinking safe routes to school in gentrifying communities

We investigated how Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs intersect with gentrification in Greenville’s West End by using children’s active mobility as a lens to assess community perceptions. Through observations, behavior mapping, and interviews, we explored how mobility infrastructure impacts cultural traditions and socioeconomic dynamics. This approach allowed me to uncover tensions between design intentions and community realities, providing critical insights to guide equitable, context-sensitive urban planning in rapidly changing neighborhoods.

Read More »